Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Wrap Up Blog


This class was actually one of the tougher ones I have take in my years in college.  I am about 2 weeks away from graduation and it has amazed me throughout how little I knew about the Middle-East.  I am a History minor and most of my courses have been centered around US/European History with some Latin America sprinkled in.  The Middle East was totally left out of my curriculum until this year.  The history of the Middle East is a deep, rich one.  There are so many different places, events and people that make up the history of the Middle East.  I never realized how many different battles there were and how strong some of the empires were.  The Ottoman Empire for example was one of the strongest, fiercest empires of all time!  I never knew how well trained their militaries were and how they even used muskets and gun powder before most other nations.  The second major thing that I learned was about the Armenian Genocide.  I had never heard about it until this semester.  To know that this event preceded what went on in Nazi Germany truly boggles my mind.  This was just as heinous an act as anything in history!  You would think that people would've have risen up after the Armenian Genocide and not let something so bad happen in Nazi Germany.  You hear so much about the Holocaust, but not much about the Armenian Genocide.  I'm not saying people should hear about the Holocaust less, I am just saying that the Armenian Genocide deserves more attention then it gets.  Overall, there was a lot of reading and work in this class, but after finishing up everything it seems pretty satisfying to learn some new stuff I didn't know before.   

Iran/Iraq War Might Not Have Happened If....


I am just putting this out there, and people may not agree with me, but I think the war between Iraq and Iran in the 1980's would not have happened if Reza Shah was able to get support for his western reforms in Iran before the Iranian Revolution.  If he would have been able to get the full support of the people and completely westernize Iran, there most likely would not have been a war.  At the time of the war, Iraq was not considered part of this Islamic Union that other countries were a part of.  Ayatollah Khomeini believed that Iraq's government was evil and needed to be defeated and replaced with a government centered around Islam.  Just think if Khomeini never won the people over and the Western reforms started by Reza Shah would have stuck.  Iran would've been a modern "western type" state and therefore most likely would not have had a conflict with Iraq.  I just thought that was an interesting thought and I wanted to share it with everyone.  

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Gate of The Sun -"Seeing Through Palestinian Eyes"

The conflict between Jews and Arabs has been going on almost one hundred years now.  Millions of lives have already been lost and to this day there is still fighting, so those numbers are sure to increase.  A lot gets lost during these times of war between Israel and Palestine.  Westerners get caught up and tend to see the conflict from the eyes of the Israeli people.  They don’t truly understand that the Palestinians have eyes too.  Westerners throw out labels of “murderers” and “terrorists,” and I am not suggesting that some aren’t.  I’m suggesting that some people on the Israeli side can be considered “terrorists” and “murderers” also. 

            The fictional novel, Gate of the Sun written by Elias Khoury, does a great job of showing the conflict from the eyes of the Palestinian people.  In this novel, you can see that the Palestinian people are not cold-blooded killers and that they even have sympathy and compassion for their Israeli counterparts.  The author does a tremendous job of telling the story of the Palestinian people through the stories of a few fictional characters. 

            The Arab –Israeli conflict has roots in the fall of the Ottoman Empire.  During that time, there was a mad dash to determine what to do with the areas of the fallen Empire.  Countries such as Britain, France and Russia all had a stake in what to do with the land.  These countries totally disregarded the thoughts and feelings of the Arab people that were already living in these areas.  These people were shuffled around all over what is now known as the Middle East.  Also during this time, there was a rise in what is known as Zionism.  Zionism is essentially known as the policy to establish and develop a homeland for the Jewish people.  Through much debate with the occupying countries, most notably the British, the Zionists agreed that their homeland should be stationed within the borders of Palestine, which is an Arab state.  More and more Jewish people began to migrate to Palestine.  With the aid of Jewish Para-military units known as the Stern Gang and the Irgun, the nation of Israel was officially formed in 1948. 

            The new nation of Israel was officially recognized by the United States and Britain, and a new government was installed.  Approximately twenty years after the creation of Israel, the Six Day War occurred and forced more and more Palestinians from their homes.  Israel was able to conquer more and more territory including Golan Heights and the West Bank.  Once again, by doing so forced more and more people from their homes. 

Today, not much has changed within the confines of the conflict.  Palestinian forces have terrorized the Israeli people and the Israeli’s have fired back and organized their own attacks as well.  These are the events that are shown all over the news, but what is missing is a sense on how the people of Palestine really feel.  That is what Khoury has done in Gate of The Sun.  It gives Westerners a look into the feelings of the Palestinian people and gives the conflict a new perspective.

The book is based primarily around the two main Palestinian characters Dr. Khalil Ayyoub and a man named Yunes.  Yunes is in a hospital somewhere in Lebanon and is being cared for by Khalil.  Yunes has suffered a stroke and is now in a coma.  Yunes used to be a freedom fighter in the Palestinian military and has had many experiences before the formation of Israel and after into the 1990’s.  Khalil sees Yunes as a hero and even goes as far as to call him a father figure. 

Since Yunes is in a coma, Khalil stays at his bedside night after night and reminisces about stories from his own past and stories from Yunes’ past.  He hopes that the stories will eventually wake Yunes from the coma and bring him back.  This is where you, as the reader, get a real sense of how the Palestinian people were feeling during these terrible times of conflict. 

You hear of the story of Yunes as a freedom fighter and how the Israeli government wants to capture him.  He is forced to be on the run for the most of his life because he was a freedom fighter.  Khalil tells the stories of Yunes and his wife and how they have to always meet at the cave known as The Gate of The Sun.  This is the only time they were able to see each other because Yunes was always on the run.  They ate many meals and even conceived children at this spot. 

This story in particular gives readers a look into what life as a Palestinian can be.  Yunes stuck up for his people and his land as a freedom fighter and then had to pay the ultimate price of not being able to be with his family because he was wanted by the Israeli government.  His wife constantly has to live in fear and is even stopped by Israeli police because she is pregnant.  She eventually lies and tells them that the baby isn’t Yunes and that she is pregnant because she cheated on him.  The reason she does this is because Yunes was on the run and couldn’t risk exposing him.  It shows how the Arab Israeli conflict can ruin the lives of the people involved in it. 

Some of the other stories that Khalil speaks about are real life events that occurred.  He speaks on the Holocaust and sympathizes with the Jewish people.  He says that nobody should’ve sat around silently while this terrible act of genocide was occurring in Nazi Germany.  This is the first sign of sympathy towards the Jewish people.  This is significant in the story because it shows that Palestinian men are not just animals and cold blood murderers.  Westerners believe that the Arabs want to kill all Jews and their supporters, but it is simply not the case.  The next story that shows sympathy towards Jews is the story about the Munich Olympics where Jewish athletes were killed.  Khalil tells the readers how Yunes was against those kinds of acts and actually took a stand against it.  Once again, this shows that even a Palestinian soldier feels compassion towards the Jewish people and is not simply a terrorist or a murderer. 

The most important stories in the novel are the stories of the people who occupied Palestine.  Through these small vignettes, the reader gets a sense of who the Arab Palestinians are as people.  This can open a lot of eyes in Western culture and can show that these people were treated terribly and are not just barbarians. 

In conclusion, this work of fiction does a tremendous job of showing Westerners that the Palestinian people have such a deep, rich culture.  The stories in this book allow the Palestinian story to be told to the Western world.  The author shows that they are people as well and not just terrorists and murderers.  While reading this book, readers gets a sense of who the Palestinians are as people and why they are struggling just as much, if not more, than their Israeli counterparts.  The Arab-Israeli conflict has affected millions of innocent people and has negatively affected all who are involved.  This book finally shows the conflict through the eyes of the Palestinian and that seems to be a tremendous step in maybe finding peace.             

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Recent Israel/Arab News


http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/04/21/israel.iran.nazi/index.html#cnnSTCText

I read this article today on CNN.com speaking about some recent barbs fired by Ahmadinejad of Iran and Israel's vice Prime Minster Silvan Shalom.  Shalom was firing back at Iran after Iran leader Ahmadinejad came out and publicly called Israel a racists government who kicked out the Arab people of Palestine due to their race.  Shalom fired back by calling Iran "like Nazi Germany."  Those are fighting words if I ever heard them.  Both of these nations believe that the other is constantly in the wrong.  That has been the root of this conflict for many years.  But once again, I pose the question, who really is right in this situation?  I would say that both sides have a legitimate argument.  What does everyone else think? 

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

The Six Day War and it's effects


The Six Day War was one of the most crucial moments in the history of the Arab Israeli Conflict.  Nasser rallied arab nations and positioned them to remove the UNEF peacekeeping forces from the Sinai Peninsula.  Nasser's idea of pan arabism was at the center of the mobilization of these arab forces in the region.  You really can't blame Nasser for mobilizing these troops to reclaim land that he believed belonged to the Arabs.  There had been so many contradictory attempts to divide land and keep peace that it was inevitable that this would occur.  The mobilization of the troops got Israel's attention and in 6 days they inflicted a humiliating attack on the Arab forces.  They were able to acquire more and more land including the West Bank and Golan Heights.  I think it could be argued that if the Arabs were not ambushed by the Israeli's there might be a totally different picture in Israel.  Israel might not be an official Jewish state today if the Arab forces led by Nasser were successful in this war.    

Deir Yassin


I just visited the Deir Yassin Remembered web site and learned some facts that I did not know about.  I read through some of the material and learned that indeed the events at Deir Yassin is definitely a massacre of sorts.  Obviously it is not on the scale of some other massacres in history, but it is a massacre nonetheless.  I do agree with some of the statements on the site that Westerners are finally viewing Palestinians as Human Beings.  Personally, I was probably guilty of looking at Palestinian people as "terrorists" or as bad human beings, but my feelings have changed more recently.  I do believe that those who attack the United States are terrorists and that they should be held accountable for killing innocents.  But I also now have an understanding of what the Palestinian people are going through and it is truly terrible.  The fact that these people constantly live in fear is terrible, and I am more understanding now than before.  

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, more successful than Reza Shah

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk was much more successful in reforming his country than Reza Shah for a few reasons.  The first, and what I feel is the major reason why he was successful, was that the reforms in Turkey during the Ottoman Empire were already underway before Ataturk began to reform.  Ataturk essentially expanded on these western reforms that were already in place, and it allowed for the people to adapt them easier.  In Iran, under Reza Shah, these reforms were totally new ideas and it was perceived as very radical by the people.  The second reason that Ataturk was more successful is because he was forced to create a state and government at the same time which allowed them to fuse together.  Reza Shah had to create a new government in a state that already existed, which made it much harder for the reforms to work.  One of the final reasons that Ataturk was successful was because he took power by popular revolution, whereas Reza Shah took power in Iran by a coup d'etat.  Obviously, the people are supporting Ataturk with the revolution and Reza Shah is forcing his ideas on the people of Iran.  These are all just a few reasons why Ataturk was successful and Reza Shah was not.